"I'm very happy ... I'm happy it's over," Rolando Villazon told Reuters backstage after Friday's Don Carlo premiere at the Royal Opera House.
"It is true that it was the first big premiere since the break. As much as I tried not to think about it, it was even more stressful (than normal),"
"I think it was high-intensity nerves, especially towards the second half"
The piece goes on to note that "applause on the night for Villazon ... was warm and loud, but several critics were less generous" with Richard Morrison of the Times finding Villazon's voice "more and more pressurized" as the evening progressed, and George Hall in The Stage thinking him "stressed and even out of tune. It's a role too big for his lyric tenor".
So who's right? Is it all over for Rolando?
Well, there was the odd crack, and an occasional hint of strain at the top. And I stress occasional. These were scattered flaws, barely worthy of comment, in an intensely committed performance of great musicality and dramatic conviction.
It sounded to me as if he was perhaps not in perfect health (his own comments about nerves make perfect sense). But he certainly wasn't in terminal vocal meltdown either, and it's wrong to assume that these issues detracted in any major way from the impact of his own performance, let alone the show as a whole.
I'm going back for a later show in the run, so I'll reserve my final judgement till then, but honestly? - I think the audience who gave Rolando such a warm hand at the final curtain had the measure of things.
I've not been yet, but I do worry when critics try to dismiss an entire career on a First Night. Any given night might not work well, but a First is more likely. And enough people of discernment have written positively
Posted by: Gert | 10 June 2008 at 08:25 AM
I just hope there's enough been written on both sides for people who haven't had the privilege of attending and making up their own minds to understand that it's not a cut and dried issue.
Posted by: inter mezzo | 10 June 2008 at 10:42 PM